As a consumer of digital content, I have a grave concern about the proposed
Broadcast Flag. I enjoy the flexibility and control that technology gives me. I
can be more than a passive recipient of content; I can modify, create and
participate. Technology currently gives me more choices by allowing me to record
a television program and watch it later; clip a small piece of TV and splice it
into a home movie; send an email clip of my child's football game to a distant
relative; or record a TV program onto a DVD and play it at my friend's
apartment. The broadcast flag seems designed to remove this control and
flexibility that I enjoy.
Historically, the law has allowed for those not affiliated with creating content
to come up with new, unanticipated ways of using it. For example, Sony invented
the modern VCR -- a movie studio did not. (Sony did not own a movie studio at
the time.) Diamond Multimedia invented the MP3 player -- a recording label did
not. Unfortunately, the broadcast flag has the potential to put an end to that
dynamic. Because the broadcast flag defines what uses are authorized and which
are not, unanticipated uses of content which are not foreseeable today are by
default unauthorized. If we allow the content industry to "lock in" the
definition of what is and is not legitimate use, we curtail the ability for
future innovation - unanticipated but legal uses that will benefit consumers.
I am a law-abiding consumer who believes that piracy should be prevented and
prosecuted. However, if theoretical prevention comes at the cost of prohibiting
me from making legal, personal use of my content, then the FCC should be working
to protect all consumers rather than enable those who would restrict consumer
rights. In the case of the broadcast flag, it seems that it will have little
effect on piracy. With file-sharing networks, a TV program has only to be
cracked once, and it will propagate rapidly across the Internet. So, while I may
be required to purchase consumer electronic devices that cost more and allow me
to do less, piracy will not be diminished.
In closing, I urge you to require the content industry to demonstrate that its
proposed technologies will allow for all legal uses and will actually achieve
the stated goal of preventing piracy. If they cannot, I urge you not to mandate
the broadcast flag.
I do find it frivolous, and a bit silly, to include an anti-copy flag as I can
still copy in the down converted analog domain and get quite a good recording.
It can then be reconverted to digital, being cleaned up through digital
processing if needed. Consumers desiring a specific program are not going to
allow the inability to copy in digital stop them.
Look at how many in the beginning of cd copied those onto
cassette for car playback. Many teenagers also copied and shared cds via
With currently available technology and hacking knowledge the flag will be, soon
enough, rendered ineffective. So, if it is going to be broadcast, it is going to
be copied, whether in digital or analog. If the production companies do not want
it to be copied then they will have to withold broadcast.
The flag is just another useless
piece of technology that will withstand hacking all of 6 months. No need to
waste the public's time and money on it, nor yours. Let them just issue it on
had its recording copy protection cracked before even leaving the starting gate!